Legal Opinion

United State Ex Rel. Schneider v. Esperdy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 10, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGOHEY, District Judge.

These four petitioners are aliens presently held without bail in deportation proceedings. Prior to October 24, 1952, when they were taken and thus held, each of them had been at large on bail for a substantial period of time. They assert that the At torney General’s decision to rearrest and hold them without bail was “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable.”

After argument, hearings were ordered. Petitioners objected to hearings on the ground that in each case it was clear from the petition, return and traverse that the Attorney General had acted arbitrarily. All except…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States Ex Rel. Klig v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States Ex Rel. Belfrage v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  3. United States ex rel. Kwong Hai Chew v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. United States ex rel. Nukk v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization at Port of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API