Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Klig v. Shaughnessy
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 17, 1950No. Civ. 62-105, 62-41, 62-42, 61-400, 61-334, 61-393, 62-101, 62-100, 61-337, 61-376, 62-103, 61-368, 61-373, 62-104, 62-102, 62-17PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
The sixteen relators filed separate petitions for habeas corpus. The writs were awarded; returns and traverses filed; and a hearing held pursuant thereto. All the petitions raise fundamentally the same issues, and, therefore, will be disposed of together in this opinion. Where material factual variations appear, they will receive appropriate comment.
All the relators had been previously arrested pending deportation proceedings under warrants alleging violation of one or more of the provisions of the Anarchist Exclusion Act of October 16, 1918, as amended, 8 U.S.CA.. § 137.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Potash v. District Director of Immigration & NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Prentis v. ManoogianCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States Ex Rel. Yaris v. Esperdy, Acting District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Myer Klig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United State Ex Rel. Schneider v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.