Legal Opinion

Cromer v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 8, 2004No. 02-1646, 02-1795PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge HUDSON joined.

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:

Donald G. Cromer appeals the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion, as well as an order imposing upon him a prefiling injunction and finding him in criminal and civil contempt. We affirm the Rule 60(b) ruling, but vacate the prefil-ing injunction and contempt findings, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

After Cromer filed an employment discrimination action against his…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Holt v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. In Re LoyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  3. Workman v. GMAC Mortgage LLC (In Re Workman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
  4. Fatta v. M & M Properties Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Lewis v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API