Legal Opinion

United States v. Abuhouran

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 2004No. Criminal Action 95-00560-01Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POLLAK, Judge.

Presently before the court are two separate motions, each titled “Motion to Modify or Correct an Imposed Term of Imprisonment Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2),” filed by defendant Hitham Abuhouran, and the government’s two submissions filed in opposition to the motions. For the reasons discussed herein, Mr. Abuhouran’s motions will be denied.

Factual and Procedural Background

Hitham Abuhouran (a/k/a Steve Houran) pleaded guilty on September 10, 1996, to an indictment charging, inter alia, money laundering and bank fraud related to an elaborate scheme that caused the 1992…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. J. David Smith, in 98-6377 Steven Dandrea, in 98-6378Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Hitham Abuhouran A/K/A Steve HouranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Vernon A. MontagueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Dean Martin ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Joseph FiorelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API