Legal Opinion

United States v. J. David Smith, in 98-6377 Steven Dandrea, in 98-6378

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 9, 1999No. 98-6377, 98-6378PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

The defendants were convicted on a number of charges arising out of an embezzlement/kickbaek scheme. The District Court used the more severe money laundering guideline instead of that for fraud as the basis for sentencing. We will affirm the convictions, but remand for resentenc- ing based on the pronouncements of the United States Sentencing Commission that the money laundering guideline was drafted to cover conduct more egregious than that involved here.

GTECH Corporation provided lottery services for a number of states including New Jersey. Defendant…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. United States v. Carole Diaz, AKA Carole M. Cefaratti, Carole Cefaratti-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Fred De La MataCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. LoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API