Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1969No. 1691PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

The defendant, Nathaniel Franklin, was convicted of the robbery of the Diamond E. Market in Phoenix, Arizona. The testimony adduced at trial as it relates to the questions raised on appeal indicates that he was arrested by two uniformed police officers. The officers gave chase after being informed by a woman that the suspect then running by had robbed a market.

One of the officers found the defendant crouched in a shed with a pistol in his hand. The officer saw him take a stocking cap from his head and throw it to the ground. Besides the pistol the officer took some bullets and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. State v. FranklinArizona Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BradyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. BestCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API