Legal Opinion
Parker Rust Proof Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 27, 1925No. 424PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
Parker Rust Proof Company brings this suit against Ford Motor Company, alleging the infringement of. United States letters patent No. 870,937, granted November 12, 1907, to Thomas Watts Coslett of Birmingham, England, for certain new and useful improvements relating to the treatment of iron or steel for preventing oxidation or rusting.
This patent was assigned" to the plaintiff in 1916, and it is shown that the sum of $95,000 was paid for this patent and for another United States patent to the same inventor which covered a modification of the process set forth in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Spalding v. John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Auto Pneumatic Action Co. v. Kindler & CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Baltzley v. Spengler Loomis Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Parker-Rust-Proof Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1945
- Howe v. AtwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
- Claude Neon Electrical Products, Inc. v. Brilliant Tube Sign Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
- American Chemical Paint Co. v. Parker Rust Proof Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940
- Arminas Wagner Enterprises v. Ohio Security Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.