State v. Rogers
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is a direct appeal from a jury conviction for murder, first degree, in violation of § 565.003, RSMo 1978. The judgment is affirmed.
Appellant presents three points, which in summary charge that the trial court erred in (1) admitting, over objection, appellant’s statements to police, because said statements were secured after the police failed to scrupulously honor his assertion to remain silent; (2) failing to instruct the jury-on murder, second degree; and (3) denying his motion for new trial because of juror misconduct.
There being no direct challenge to the sufficiency of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. RoyalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HornbeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. HornbeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986