Legal Opinion

Yoshida v. Nobrega, Adm'r

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1952No. 2791PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff in error filed suit in assumpsit against the defendant. Defendant’s demurrer was sustained by the court without leave to amend. A judgment containing a bill of costs was filed by defendant ex parte. In the bill of costs contained in the judgment was the item of attorneys’ fees in assumpsit as authorized by section 9754, Eevised Laws of Hawaii 1945.

There was no notice served upon the plaintiff either on the bill of costs or the form of judgment as required by the rules of the circuit court. While we cannot too strongly condemn such practice, particularly in the taxation of money sums…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. Kona Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Lowrie v. BaldwinHawaii Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ranger Insurance Co. v. HinshawHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Rosa v. JohnstonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Sapp v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Schubert v. SaluniHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API