Legal Opinion

Schubert v. Saluni

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1993No. 15628PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The principal question on appeal is whether, in a summary possession action, where the district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the case on jurisdictional grounds, the defendants were “successful parties” entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 607-17 (1985). A subordinate question is whether such defendants were entitled to an allowance of costs. We conclude that such defendants were not entitled to an award of attorney’s fees, but were entitled to an allowance of costs in the discretion of the district court.

I

On April 16,1990, plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Smothers v. RenanderHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Makahuena Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Zator Ex Rel. Zator v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ranger Insurance Co. v. HinshawHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Shaw v. North American Title Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ling v. YokoyamaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Mendes v. Heirs and/or Devisees of KealakaiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API