Legal Opinion

William Bergenthal Co. v. Security State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 26, 1907No. Nos. 15,204—(142)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in replevin in the district court for Ramsey county to recover a quantity of liquors or $574.83, the value thereof, in case recovery could not be had. The case was tried before Olin B. Uewis, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action to recover possession of a stock of liquors, which the plaintiff alleged in its complaint it was entitled to recover, or their value, $574.83. The answer denied the allegations of the complaint, and alleged that the defendant was the owner of the property. Plaintiff had a verdict, and the defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

This is the second appeal in this case. See 98 Minn. 414. The goods in question were sold and shipped by the plaintiff at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to Allen, a liquor dealer at Monticello, this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manwaring v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. William Bergenthal Co. v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. First Bond & Mortgage Co. v. YanceySupreme Court of Florida · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API