Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Pauley

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1984No. 15-81PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice:

This is a judicial disciplinary proceeding. The Judicial Hearing Board has recommended that we suspend Kermit W. Pau-ley, the respondent magistrate, for a period of six months as authorized by Rule III(C)(13)(a) of the Rules of Procedure for the Handling of Complaints Against Justices, Judges, and Magistrates (hereinafter Disciplinary Rules). After an independent examination of the record, we adopt the disposition recommended by the Board.

The Board found that Pauley failed to comply with the provisions of W.Va.Code, 62-1-5 & 6, and thereby violated Canons 1, 2(A), 3(A)(1), and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PersingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. West Virginia Judicial Inquiry Commission v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re PauleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Matter of RossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. State v. MasonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matter of CrislipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re MarkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of GorbyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Matter of BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re Magistrate Margaret MonroeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API