Legal Opinion

Heartland Apartment Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Mission

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 2, 2015No. 111521PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

In this era, when all cities and towns thirst for revenue to provide basic governmental services, we must decide if a transportation user fee, enacted by the City of Mission, is a tax, and if so, decide if it is an excise tax not permitted by the Kansas Legislature. We offer our perspective on the two issues that arise in this litigation.

Is this a tax?

Annually, Mission, Kansas collects a transportation user fee on all improved real estate, using it for public street maintenance. If an owner fails to pay, the city imposes late fees, interest, and attaches a lien on the real estate.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Fort Hays State University v. Fort Hays State University ChapterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. Callaway v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forever Fencing Inc. v. Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  2. Heartland Apartment Ass'n v. City of MissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API