Legal Opinion
State v. Rachuy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1993No. C7-92-227Published
1Opinion of the Court
502 N.W.2d 51 (1993)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Gale Allen RACHUY, Petitioner, Appellant.
No. C7-92-227.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
May 28, 1993.
As Amended on Grant of Limited Rehearing July 8, 1993.
John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Brad Delapena, Asst. State Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Stanich, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and John K. Carlson, Pine County Atty., Pine City, for respondent.
Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.
SIMONETT, Justice.
The court of appeals affirmed defendant's conviction…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. WellmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. RachuySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. RachuyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993