Moody v. Pomeroy
New York Supreme Court
■ Error to Cortland common pleas. Pomeroy sued Moody before a justice, and after a trial by jury, there was a verdict for the defendant. On certiorari the common pleas reversed the judgment, because the justice went into the .jury room while they were deliberating upon their verdict, and gave them instructions upon the evidence, without the presence, or the express consent of the parties. They knew the justice was going into the jury room, and made no objection. .
1Per curiam
The case of Taylor v. Betsford, (13 John. 487,) is directly in point; and although it is an extreme case, (1 Hill, 61; 7 John. 200; 13 Wend. 274,) it seems not to have been overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. BetsfordNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Henlow v. LeonardNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Rogers v. MoulthropNew York Supreme Court · 1835
3Cited by9 opinions
- Texas Midland R.R. Co. v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Commonwealth v. HouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Read v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Plunkett v. AppletonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1876
- Fiero v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1855
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.