Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co. v. McMichael
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.
The following statement from appellants’ brief is substantially correct:
Appellee J. N. McMichael failed in the mercantile business on October 25, 1890. Appellants, as creditors of said J. N. McMichael, on November 18, 1890, brought suit upon their debt against said McMichael, and at the same time procured a writ of attachment against the property of said McMichael, which was levied upon the land in controversy as his property. Judgment was obtained by appellants in said suit upon their debt and foreclosing their attachment lien, and at the sale under the decree of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McKamey v. ThorpTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Overstreet v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Blum v. LightTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Gwyer v. FigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Barnett v. VincentTexas Supreme Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mayor v. BreedingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Fourthman v. FourthmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Schwantkowsky v. DykowskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- First Nat. Bank of Lockney v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.