Nu-Way Service Stations, Inc. v. Vandenberg Bros. Oil Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
I am in accord with the opinion by Mr. Justice Wiest in so far as it holds that the option in question is valid and that it constitutes a covenant running with the land. But I cannot agree with his statement that “defendant had a right to accept the terms of the option when the sale was made to plaintiff.” The contract sale to plaintiff was made October 27, 1936. The option held by defendant did not give it a right to purchase on that date. Instead the option was limited by its own terms to a period of 90 days beginning at the expir ation of defendant’s lease, February 1, 1937. Tbe option…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogers v. BurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Bailey v. GroverMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Magoffin v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
- La Dow v. E. Bement & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brenner v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- LaROSE MARKET, INC v. SYLVAN CENTER, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Laevin v. St. Vincent De Paul Society of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Ayres v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Weintz v. BumgarnerMontana Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.