Legal Opinion

Aparicio v. Comcast, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 11, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-03952-JSTPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: ECF No. 44

Before the Court is Defendant Comcast Cable Communication Management, LLC’s (“Comcast”)' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 44. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part,

I. BACKGROUND

This is an. action for employment discrimination, Plaintiff Jorge F. Aparicio asserts claims under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov. Code § 12940(a), for disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, failure to engage, in an interactive process, failure to prevent…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alexis Rivera v. O’Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC., and Does 1-10District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  2. Altemus v. Amazon.com ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  3. Babot v. Equilon Enterprises LLC DBA Shell Oil Products USDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Bailey v. Mount Diablo Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  5. Brager v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API