Legal Opinion

Weir v. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Gaslin, J., sitting for Pound, J.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for the depreciation-in the value of his residence property *213by reason of the construction and operation of a railroad track in the street upon which the property abutted. There is no bill of exceptions, and the cause is presented upon the record, consisting of the pleadings, instructions to the jury, verdict, and judgment. The motion for a new trial assigned a number of grounds or reasons why the verdict of the jury should be set aside, but as many of them involved admission or rejection of evidence, or other grounds which would require…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hastings & Grand Island R. R. v. IngallsNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Cunningham v. TonnemakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barr v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Morrow v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Brooks v. DutcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Anderson v. Nebraska Defense Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Sherwin, Sherwin & Co. v. O'ConnorNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API