Legal Opinion

United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Phillip E. Warren v. Alva E. Kimrey and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1974No. 73-1515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is a timely appeal by defendants Alva E. Kimrey and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) from final judgment based on jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Warren. Kim-rey upon the basis of a competitive bid in response to the Government’s solicitation for bids purchased specified buildings from the Army at the Pine Bluff Arsenal for $17,137.13. The buildings were to be removed and demolished. The purchaser was required to fill in excavations and grade. The fill and grading work was subcontracted to Warren. Kimrey provided the Govern…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. University of Southern California v. Cost of Living CouncilTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Brezina Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. United States Ex Rel. James E. Simon Co. v. Ardelt-Horn Construction Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buddy Systems, Inc., a California Corporation v. Exer-Genie, Inc., a Corporation, and E. E. HolkesvickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. TransAmerica Premier Insurance v. OberDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995
  3. United States Ex Rel. B & M Roofing of Colorado, Inc. v. AKM Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997
  4. Chicago Rigging Co. v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API