Legal Opinion
Chicago Rigging Co. v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 17, 1989No. 87 C 10922PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NORDBERG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Chicago Rigging Co., has brought this suit pursuant to the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d (1982), which governs the rights of persons furnishing labor or materials in the construction, alteration, or repair of any public building or public work of the United States. The defendant, Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. (Uniroyal), was awarded a government contract for the demolition of certain buildings, but did not require the subcontractor of the project, D.A. Principali Engineering, Inc. (PEI), to obtain a payment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Universities Research Assn., Inc. v. CoutuSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Louis Allen McDaniel Jr. v. The University of Chicago and Argonne, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Strong v. American Fence Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commissioner of Labor v. Gary Steel Products Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- United States v. Sun Engineering Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1993