Legal Opinion
Fishgold v. OnBank & Trust Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 25, 1999No. 6:96-cv-06572PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
I. Background
By prior order of June 23, 1997, this Court directed that monies collected from accounts receivable of David Fishgold, Inc. (“Fishgold”), be held in trust for the benefit of Fishgold’s suppliers under provisions of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”).
Fishgold originally commenced this action when it sought to enjoin one of its creditors, OnBank & Trust Company (“On-Bank”), from seizing its accounts receivable to satisfy its loan, now in default. Fishgold claimed that this seizure was in violation of PACA. Eventually,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morris Okun, Inc. v. Harry Zimmerman, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Bank of Los Angeles v. Official PACA Creditors' Committee (In Re Southland + Keystone)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Debruyn Produce Co. v. Richmond Produce Co. (In Re Richmond Produce Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Golman-Hayden Co. v. Fresh Source Produce Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Double Green Produce, Inc. v. Forum Supermarket Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- A & J PRODUCE CORP. v. ChangDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Six L'S Packing Co., Inc. v. Post & Taback, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Continental Food Group, LLC v. P.J. Produce, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.