Legal Opinion

In Re Reading Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 13, 1997No. 95-1987, 95-1988UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge.

After a decade-long reorganization, the Reading Railroad emerged from bankruptcy on January 1,1981. On that day, the newly-established Reading Company 1 was given a fresh start by a consummation order which granted Reading protection from all pre-con-summation debts and liabilities. Now, sixteen years later, the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) asks that we circumvent the protection of the bankruptcy discharge and permit Conrail to seek contribution from Reading for environmental clean-up costs. The- district court rejected Conrail’s claim. We…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. In The Matter Of M. Frenville Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. United States of America, in 95-1987. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. Consolidated Rail Corporation, in 95-1988Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API