Legal Opinion
Polar Shipping Ltd. v. Oriental Shipping Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1982No. 79-4485PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
I. The Facts.
On January 15,1970, Polar Shipping Limited (“Polar”), as owner, and Oriental Shipping Corporation, as charterer, entered into a charter of the vessel M/T Polar Saturn, since renamed Globtik Saturn. The charter was amended to name Oriental and S.S. Sanko Co., Ltd., jointly and severally, as charterers. Oriental is now called Taiwan Marine Corporation. We refer to the charterers as “Sanko.”
The charter, a printed form known as a “SHELLDEMISE,” was for a term of nine years, with provisions for an extension and for redelivery of the vessel upon expiration.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. $39,000 in Canadian CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Paul McMichael and Joseph A. Nichelini v. County of Napa and Napa County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.