Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 18, 1993No. ACMR 9100315PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

JOHNSTON, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of missing movement through design and willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer in violation of Articles 87 and 90, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 887 and 890 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ].1 The convening authority approved the sentence of no punishment.

The issue in this case is whether a soldier who claims conscientious objection and is prevented by his military superiors from submitting a conscientious…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Boudreaux v. United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military ReviewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. Pruner v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  5. United States v. MorseU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. WileyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. MooreNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  4. United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. WalkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API