United States v. Johnson
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW
JOHNSTON, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of missing movement through design and willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer in violation of Articles 87 and 90, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 887 and 890 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ].1 The convening authority approved the sentence of no punishment.
The issue in this case is whether a soldier who claims conscientious objection and is prevented by his military superiors from submitting a conscientious…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boudreaux v. United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military ReviewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- Pruner v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- United States v. MorseU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. WileyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. MooreNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. WalkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.