Legal Opinion
Feiger v. Iral Jewelry, Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1975PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeatrice Shainswit, J.
Plaintiff, a jewelry salesman, sues for his commissions for the years 1972 and 1973; defendant admits the commissions are due, but refuses payment on the ground of disloyalty. After trial, without a jury, I find for plaintiff on the facts and the law.
Defendant is a small firm selling, at wholesale, custom-made 18-carat gold jewelry. It was formed in 1965, and before 1974 consisted of two equal stockholders, Ira Schechter and Albert Lipten. At present the sole owner is Mr. Schechter, since Mr. Lipten is now in business with plaintiff.
It is stipulated that plaintiff, defendant’s sole salesman…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Leo Silfen, Inc. v. CreamNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Harry R. Defler Corp. v. KleemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Kleinfeld v. Roburn Agencies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maritime Fish Products, Inc. v. World-Wide Fish Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Walter Karl, Inc. v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- British American & Eastern Co., Inc. And Frederick L. Sunley, Plaintiffs v. Wirth Limited, Wirth Incorporated and Manfred F. WirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Schwartz v. LeonardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.