United States v. Naus
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Justice.
This is a rent overcharge case in which the plaintiff has moved, under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for summary judgment upon the complaint, the. answer, and defendants’ answer to plaintiff’s Request for Admissions.
From a study of the pleadings and the law it appears that there is at least a tec-nical violation of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended. See Sections 825.2(c) and 825.5(a) (3) of the Rent Regulations.
The complaint herein prays for treble damages for past violations and an injunction against future violations. Whether or not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bowles v. KrodelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Shearer v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Woods v. MertesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1949
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Copacabana, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955