Legal Opinion

United States v. Naus

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 13, 1951No. 6097PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, Chief Justice.

This is a rent overcharge case in which the plaintiff has moved, under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for summary judgment upon the complaint, the. answer, and defendants’ answer to plaintiff’s Request for Admissions.

From a study of the pleadings and the law it appears that there is at least a tec-nical violation of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended. See Sections 825.2(c) and 825.5(a) (3) of the Rent Regulations.

The complaint herein prays for treble damages for past violations and an injunction against future violations. Whether or not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowles v. KrodelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  2. Shearer v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  3. Woods v. MertesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Copacabana, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API