Legal Opinion

H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 29, 1965No. 6516PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a finding of invalidity of a process patent for pretreating French fried potatoes so they will fry to a substantially even color. The facts and an extensive discussion are found in the opinion of the district court, 236 F. Supp. 601. Without deciding whether the evidence justified a conclusion that the patent claims in suit are invalid because wholly inoperative, we think the evidence supports the court’s holding that they are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112 because of the extent of experimentation required of one skilled in the art in order to ascertain their “teaching.”

A…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Borg-Warner Corporation v. Paragon Gear Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  2. CPC International, Inc. v. Standard Brands Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  3. H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1968
  4. Thomas A. O. Gross v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  5. Caldwell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API