Legal Opinion

Dail v. Adams Building Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1947No. 32813Published

1Opinion

On Second Petition for Rehearing.

2DissentRiley, J.

Upon careful consideration of the record in the above case, I am convinced that the second petition for rehearing herein should be granted.

This action was commenced by plaintiff, E. D. Dail, against Adams Building Corporation and the city of Tulsa for damages against the first named defendant and for mandatory injunctive relief or, in the alternate, damages against the city of Tulsa.

Plaintiff, in his amended petition, alleged that in 1928 his predecessor in title constructed a private sewer from a point near the city limits of Tulsa, along a county highway to…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glenn v. Woodworth, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Grady v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Hale v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API