Legal Opinion

Smith v. Buffalo Times, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hinkley, J.:

This is an eleventh-hour motion by defendant for judgment upon the pleadings. The case is at issue, and against the protest of defendant was set down for trial for March 2, 1925. Owing to the illness of defendant’s attorney, new counsel was retained who procured this order to show cause on February 28, 1925, returnable at two p. m. on said March 2, 1925. The counsel for defendant addresses his motion to the insufficiency in law of the plaintiff’s complaint and not to the combined complaint and answer. There is ample authority for this form of motion, even though it extends the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morrison v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Bennet v. . Commercial Advertiser Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Stuart v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Demarest v. HaringNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  5. Cole v. MillspaughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klein v. McGauleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Harrison v. WinchellNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Burnham v. HornadayNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  4. McClellan v. SteywartNew York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API