Legal Opinion

Cole v. Millspaugh

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1910No. Nos. 16,560—(112)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $1,999 damages for libel. Erom an order, Holt, J., sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

Action for libel. According to the complaint, a demurrer to which was sustained upon the ground of no cause of action, the Universalist Church in Minnesota has what is known as a “fellowship committee,” to which applications for pastorates are addressed. . The recommendation of the committee is necessary to the obtaining of any such pastorate. Plaintiff, a duly ordained minister of the gospel, had applied to the committee for a position, and, while his application was pending, “defendant falsely and maliciously, for the purpose of preventing plaintiff from securing the pastorship of any such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDermott v. Union Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Layne v. Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Cook v. East Shore Newspapers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  3. Cobbs v. Chicago Defender & Robert S. Abbott Publishing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Lydiard v. WingateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Northwestern Detective Agency, Inc. v. Winona Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API