Legal Opinion

Vicat v. Jamaica Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*897Items Nos. 4 and 5 of the respondent’s demand for a bill of particulars seeks information relating to the giving by plaintiff to respondent of any notice required in this matter. Plaintiff responded to this demand by pointing out, in effect, that it was not relevant or applicable to a medical malpractice action. We agree with plaintiff and find as a matter of law that plaintiff should not be required to give a further response to these items. We know of no notice requirement in a medical malpractice action as either a condition precedent or a prerequisite to maintaining such an action.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Terramare Development, Ltd. v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Sinicropi v. McCabeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Callahan v.WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API