Legal Opinion

State v. Milburn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 2006No. 03-6220; A123203PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant, who was convicted of misdemeanor angling while revoked, ORS 497.441; ORS 496.992, appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. Defendant contends that, by fishing on “free fishing weekend,” ORS 497.079, he was not “engaging] in the activity for which [an angling] license * * * is required.” ORS 497.441. We agree and, consequently, reverse.

The material facts are undisputed. Sometime in December 2002, defendant was fishing and was cited for keeping a “foul hooked” fish.1 Accordingly, on January 2, 2003, defendant’s “angling privileges”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Dixon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API