Legal Opinion
Borenstein v. The Animal Foundation
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 20, 2023No. 2:19-cv-00985Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Brian Borenstein, Case No. 2:19-cv-00985-CDS-NJK 5 Plaintiff 6 v. Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Third-Amended Complaint; 7 The Animal Foundation et al., Denying as Moot Motions to Extend Time 8 Defendants [ECF Nos. 302, 310, 311] 9 10 Plaintiff Brian Borenstein moves for leave to file a third-amended complaint (TAC) 11 against defendants The Animal Foundation (TAF), Clark County, Carly Scholten, and Victor 12 Zavala. Although some of Borenstein’s claims survived the defendants’ second motion to dismiss, 13 he seeks…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- McHenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.