Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Daudistal

United States Circuit Court

Decided April 16, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to remand case to state court, and motion to quash writ of foreign attachment: This was a suit of foreign attachment brought in a state eourt by Frederick Fischer against Philip Daudistal. By an indorsement on the writ the sheriff' was directed to attach the goods and chattels of defendant in tho possession of the Red Star Line, (Peter Wright & Sons, agents,) tho Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and John F. Hartranft, collector of the port of Philadelphia.

Read the full summary

Motion to remand case to state court, and motion to quash writ of foreign attachment: This was a suit of foreign attachment brought in a state eourt by Frederick Fischer against Philip Daudistal. By an indorsement on the writ the sheriff' was directed to attach the goods and chattels of defendant in tho possession of the Red Star Line, (Peter Wright & Sons, agents,) tho Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and John F. Hartranft, collector of the port of Philadelphia. The sheriff returned that ho liad attached as commanded and summoned as garnishees the Red Star Lino, the Pennsylvania Railroad…

1Opinion of the Court

The court filed a decree refusing the motion to remand, and setting aside the service of the writ as to John F. Hartranft, the collector. No opinion was filed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clarise Sportswear Co. v. U & W MANUFACTURING COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Sullivan v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Alvin R. Durham Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. The MarionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API