Bell v. Davis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Proceedings by Albert H. Bell, administrator, for the probate of the will of Tuckabachee, a full-blood Creek Indian, contested by Ethel Davis and others. From a judgment of the district court denying probate on appeal from an order of the county court admitting the will to probate, the administrator brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
This is a proceeding in error to review the action of the district court of Tulsa county denying the probate of a paper purporting to be the will of Tuckabachee, a full-blood Creek Indian; the case being in the district court on appeal from an order of the county court admitting the will to probate.
The will was drawn with care, and, so far as it shows upon its face, appears to have been executed in the man ner and with all the formality required by statute. It has at the end the signature of the testator, and appears on its face to have been properly attested and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Potts v. HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Commonwealth v. VoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Wilson v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Terrapin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hill v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- In Re Byford's WillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Rogers v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Manning v. DosherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- In Re Will of TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.