Legal Opinion

Manning v. Dosher

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1934No. 21572PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The record in this case shows that Joseph E. Manning, a resident of Tillman county, Okla., owned the 160 acres of land involved in this action. It had been occupied by him, his grandson, Joseph E. Meek, a minor, and an adult son, Hartwell G. Manning, and the wife and two children of Hartwell G. 'Manning. Joseph E. Manning made a will by the terms of which the land involved in this action was devised to the said Joseph E. Meek. Upon the death of Joseph E. Manning his will was admitted to probate and R. M. Dosher was appointed administrator with the will annexed. He was granted authority by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. In Re Gentry's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Parks v. LefeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Falter v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Union Trust Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Hembree v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Ringer v. ByrneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Hardridge v. HardridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Mercer v. MercerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API