Legal Opinion
Steier v. Batavia Park District
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 25, 1996No. 2-95-1397PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE McLAREN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiffs, Albert J. Steier, Jr., William G. Ruby, and James D. Tully, appeal the trial court’s order denying both their motion for summary judgment and objections to affidavits filed by defendant, the Batavia Park District (park district), and granting the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment declaring valid the defendant’s "Amended Ordinance Limiting the Use of Jet Skis” (Ordinance) (see Batavia Park District Amended Ordinance Limiting the Use of Jet Skis, Ordinance No. 101 (eff. July 18, 1989)). We reverse.
Initially, we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Buckley v. City of ReddingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Ross v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Chicago v. LawIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Crudup v. SimsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Crudup v. SimsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Steier v. Batavia Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996