Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Crudup v. Sims

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 10, 1997No. 1-97-0912Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE HOFFMAN,

specially concurring:

While I agree that the summary judgment entered by the trial court in this case should be affirmed, I write separately to register my disagreement with the legal analysis employed by the majority in reaching that conclusion.

Extending the decision in Welch v. Johnson, 147 Ill. 2d 40, 588 N.E.2d 1119 (1992), the majority concludes that the legislature did not intend removal from the ballot as a sanction for a candidate’s willful filing of a false statement of economic interest. 292 Ill. App. 3d at 1079. I disagree.

In Welch, the supreme court held that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greer v. Illinois Housing Development AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Fooden v. Board of GovernorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Carruthers v. B. C. Christopher & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Kolakowski v. VorisIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Stein v. HowlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API