Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Apfel

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1998No. Civil Action 97-2063PublishedCited by 223 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

Plaintiff David E. Palmer (“Palmer”) seeks review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying his claims for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq., and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Act. See 42 U.S .C. § 1381, et seq. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Peter B. Scuderi (“Judge Scuderi”) for a Report and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Alvin E. Goney v. James E. Clark, Jr., Warden, Fayette County JailCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by223 opinions

  1. Biller v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Gamret v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Schwartz v. HalterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Masimo Corp. v. Philips Electronic North America Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
  5. Babyak v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API