Legal Opinion

In re A.M.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 2026No. 26CA000017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as In re A.M.,

2026-Ohio-717.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) IN RE: A.M. C.A. No. 26CA000017 Appellant APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF LORAIN, OHIO CASE No. 26CR114453 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: March 3, 2026 HENSAL, Presiding Judge. {¶1} A.M. appeals an order of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas that denied her motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. This Court reverses. I. {¶2} A grand jury indicted R.M.S. for rape in violation of Revised Code Sections 2907.02(A)(2) and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
  2. State v. GasserOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API