Legal Opinion
In re A.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 2026No. 26CA000077PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as In re A.M.,
2026-Ohio-1818.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) IN RE: A.M. C.A. No. 26CA000077 Appellant APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF LORAIN, OHIO CASE No. 25CR114453 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: May 19, 2026 HENSAL, Presiding Judge. {¶1} A.M. appeals an order of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas that denied her motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. This Court affirms. I. {¶2} A grand jury indicted R.M.S. for rape in violation of Revised Code Sections 2907.02(A)(2) and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Eddy v. Farmers Property Cas. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026
- J.P. v. M.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. GasserOhio Court of Appeals · 2026