Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 6, 1957No. 9419PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The question in this case is whether a false statement made by the accused is official within the meaning of Article 107 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 907.

The evidence shows that Captain J. F. Campbell and his wife left the Officers Club at the Rhein Main Air Base, Germany. On reaching the street, the captain observed the accused with a girl. He saw the accused strike the girl in what he considered “a violent manner.” He approached the couple, identified himself as an officer, and asked for identification from the accused.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GunnelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. HutchinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. PriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. AronsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. OsborneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. SpicerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API