Legal Opinion

Schkloven v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 21, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00600Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND DAVID SCHKLOVEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. ELH-21-0600 HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(a), plaintiff David Schkloven contends that defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co. (“Hartford”) wrongfully terminated his long term disability (“LTD”) benefits, which he received through a group disability income policy (the “Policy,” the…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API