Legal Opinion
Paynter v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WlSNER, J.
Plaintiffs commenced this action, individually and on behalf of other students in the Rochester City School District (RCSD), alleging that they are being deprived of a sound basic education by a system of public education that results in the concentration of poor and minority students within RCSD. Although we are sympathetic to the efforts of the parents of these students to secure the best education possible for their children, we nevertheless conclude, for the reasons that follow, that the second amended complaint should be dismissed in its entirety.
I
Plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Board of Education v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hanig v. Yorktown Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Paynter v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Cohn v. New Paltz Central School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Jg v. Bd. of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. Dist.District Court, W.D. New York · 2002