Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beaver v. Konteh

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1998No. 98-1285PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Beaver asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. For the reasons that follow, however, Beaver’s contentions lack merit.

First, Beaver’s claim concerning the grand jury selection process attacks the validity and sufficiency of his indictment and is nonjurisdictional. Thornton v. Russell (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 93, 94, 694 N.E.2d 464, 465; State ex rel. Beaucamp v. Lazaroff (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 237, 238, 673 N.E.2d 1273, 1274.

Second, as the court of appeals concluded in Beaver’s direct appeal, Beaver invited any error arising from the felonious assault…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. V Companies v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. KeenanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Stacy v. Van CorenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State ex rel. Sampson v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. ChavezOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. McCarthy v. LippittOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API