Legal Opinion

Hames v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 26, 2006No. A06A1268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

H. B. Hames, Jr. was convicted of sale of cocaine, based on evidence that he had sold crack cocaine to a police informant working in an undercover drug investigation. In this appeal of his conviction, he claims error in the trial court’s application of the rule of sequestration and he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Finding the evidence sufficient and no abuse of discretion in the court’s application of the rule, we affirm.

I. Hames first charges the trial court with an abuse of discretion in excepting the lead drug investigator from the rule of sequestration.

Although…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rankin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Thayer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Flowers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. EZEBUIRO v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Andrews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API