Legal Opinion

Pleasants v. Blodgett

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1894No. 4284PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

This is a rehearing of Pleasants v. Blodgett, 32 Neb., 427. The opinion there reported contains a sufficient *742statement of the facts in the case. Counsel for appellants on the rehearing contends :

1. That they are bona fide purchasers for value without notice of Pleasants’ title, and strenuously insists that the district court had not before it evidence to support its finding that appellants were not bona fide purchasers, and that •this court was entirely wrong in affirming the decree of the district court. This contention of appellants has led us to a re-examination of the entire…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Uhl v. MayNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Scharman v. ScharmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hoyt v. SchuylerNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Pleasants v. BlodgettNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arlington Mill & Elevator Co. v. YatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Eayrs v. NasonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Doran v. DazeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Best v. ZutavernNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Gray v. BlankenbakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API