Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Schuyler

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Ekbok to the district court for Richardson county. Tried below before DavidsoN, J. cited: Liby v. Wolf, 10 Ohio, 83. Lessee of Jennings v. Wood, 20 Ohio, 261. Brown v. Banner Coal & Oil Co., 97 Ill., 214. Edminster v. Higgins, 6'Neb., 269. cited: Lincoln B. <& S. Ass’n v. Hass, 10 Neb., 584. Allen v. Holton,■ 20 Pick., 458. Walker v. Lincoln, 45 Me., 67. Caldwell v. Sigourney, 19 Conn., 48.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Oh. J.

This is an action to quiet title. The defendants filed an answer to the petition, to which the plaintiff demurred, and the demurrer was overruled, to which the plaintiff excepted, and now assigns the same for error. The property involved is lot 12, block 31, in the town of Rulo, Richardson county. The defendants in their answer allege that James W. Hosford is the owner of said lot; that about the 6th day of May, 1871, one Frank Carter, being the owner of said lot, conveyed the same to Samuel H. Schuyler, one of the defendants, by quit claim deed; that on or about May 16th,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Metz v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arlington Mill & Elevator Co. v. YatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pleasants v. BlodgettNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Schott v. DoshNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Pleasants v. BlodgettNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hastings v. NissenUnited States Circuit Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API