Orville L. Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, Petitioner v. Brown Brothers Harriman and Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The question for decision is whether the Secretary of Agriculture has authority to subpoena, under Section 10(h) of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act, 7 U.S.C. § 610(h), witnesses who are not themselves subject to the regulatory provisions of that act. Brown Brothers Harriman and Company, a private banking company, appeals from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York enforcing an administrative subpoena duces tecum served on the bank for the records of a customer’s account. The subpoena was issued in the course of an investigation into unlawful rebates…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Freeman v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Freeman v. BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN AND COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sid Casey v. Federal Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission v. Sid CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Federal Maritime Commission v. New York Terminal ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Marshall Durbin & Co. Of Haleyville, Inc., and Marshall Durbin Broiler Production, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Federal Trade Commission v. RockefellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- United States v. Andrew E. Hill and J.E. Pinkerton, United States of America v. Dennis Juren, United States of America v. Edward W. CromeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.